Tag: productivity

Recent Posts

“Without data, you’re just another person with an opinion.”
– W. Edwards Deming

In the fast-paced world of product development, everyone, from engineers to executives, has an opinion. But as any experienced product manager (PM) knows, opinions can be loud, persuasive, and dangerously wrong. That’s why great PMs embrace one fundamental truth: data beats opinions.

The Battle Between Gut and Evidence

Product management is a role full of ambiguity. You’re constantly making decisions under uncertainty: Which features to prioritize? Which market to target? What design will convert better?

It’s tempting to rely on instincts, stakeholder preferences, or the HiPPO (Highest Paid Person’s Opinion). But that’s a risky path. Opinions are often shaped by biases, incomplete context, or outdated information.

For example, a CEO may insist that adding a chatbot will increase user engagement because a competitor has one. But unless data supports that belief, like a clear user need, conversion metrics, or usability feedback, it’s just an opinion.

In contrast, data brings objectivity. It provides a shared truth that teams can rally around. It doesn’t mean feelings and vision are irrelevant, they’re essential, but they should be validated through evidence.

Real-World Example: Airbnb

Consider Airbnb in its early days. Founders Brian Chesky and Joe Gebbia believed professional photography of listings would boost bookings. Investors were skeptical, it seemed expensive and hard to scale. But instead of arguing, they ran an experiment: they hired a few photographers in New York to take professional photos of homes. The result? Listings with high-quality photos saw 2x–3x more bookings.

Armed with data, Airbnb rolled out the program. What started as a hunch became one of their most successful early growth strategies, because it was tested, measured, and backed by real user behavior.

Types of Data That Drive Decisions

Effective product decisions are powered by both quantitative and qualitative data. Here’s how they play distinct but complementary roles:

1. Quantitative Data

Numbers that scale, used to validate patterns.

  • Analytics: Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Amplitude
  • A/B Testing: Comparing feature variants (e.g., new button design vs. old)
  • User metrics: Retention, churn, NPS, conversion rate

Example: Dropbox used A/B testing extensively to optimize its onboarding. By tweaking messaging and signup flows based on user drop-off data, it significantly increased activation rates (Source).

2. Qualitative Data

User stories, motivations, and pain points. Often explains the “why” behind the numbers.

  • User interviews
  • Support tickets
  • Usability tests
  • Surveys

Example: Intercom used qualitative feedback to uncover that users weren’t confused by the interface itself but by unclear onboarding expectations. This insight wouldn’t come from metrics alone.

The Dangers of Being Opinion-Driven

  1. Feature Bloat Without data validation, teams build features based on assumptions. This leads to complex products that don’t solve real problems.
  2. Wasted Resources If you spend months building something nobody uses, that’s not just lost time, it’s opportunity cost. You could’ve been solving something your users actually needed.
  3. Team Misalignment Opinions create silos. Data creates alignment. When teams debate based on data, the conversation becomes collaborative instead of confrontational.

Building a Data-Driven Culture

Being data-driven is a mindset, not just a toolset. Here’s how product managers can cultivate it:

Ask Questions First

Instead of jumping to solutions, PMs should ask:

  • What problem are we solving?
  • How do we know it’s a problem?
  • What does success look like?

Set Measurable Goals

Use OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) or KPIs. A feature without a success metric is a red flag.

Validate Early and Often

Use MVPs, prototypes, fake door tests, and user interviews. Dropbox famously launched with a demo video instead of a full product, to validate demand (Source).

Democratize Data Access

Empower teams with dashboards and self-serve tools. Don’t let data become the domain of analysts only.

Balance Data with Judgment

Data isn’t perfect. It can be incomplete, misinterpreted, or biased. Great PMs combine data with intuition, then validate again. As Jeff Bezos puts it: “We are stubborn on vision. We are flexible on details.”

What If Data Conflicts With Opinion?

This happens often. A powerful stakeholder may push a feature that data doesn’t support. Here’s how to handle it:

  1. Acknowledge their perspective.
  2. Show the data objectively, use visuals.
  3. Suggest a test or experiment to evaluate the idea.
  4. Frame the risk: “If we spend 3 weeks here, we’re not working on X.”

When conversations are rooted in data, they become less personal and more productive.


In Summary

Data beats opinions, not because opinions are worthless, but because decisions built on evidence drive better outcomes. In product management, this means prioritizing features users need, building experiences they love, and creating a shared language for teams to move forward.

It’s not about removing all intuition; it’s about validating hunches through experimentation. That’s how you build better products, faster, and with far less friction.

As Peter Drucker said, “What gets measured, gets managed.” And in product management, what gets measured gets built right.

On a flight from Copenhagen to Frankfurt not too long ago I read the book How to think as Sherlock Holmes by Daniel Smith. Read it on my Kindle with a notebook close by to be able to take notes as I was reading. Notes were then transcribed into Evernote and my report archive together with additional notes on my key learnings and takeaways.

Book notes

Thinking is the process of intellectual & logical cognition

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator define the following personality types

  • Extraversion (E) – Introversion (I)
  • Sensing (S) – Intuition (N)
  • Thinking (T) – Feeling (F)
  • Judging (J) – Perception (P)

Where each person is a four-letter combination of the types. An example profile would be a Sherlock Homes that is said to be an INTP but this is naturally also debated.

The Knowledge, London cab drivers

London cab drivers must take the test of “The Knowledge” which consist of 320 key routes through London. A good cabby has a good mind and a great memory. If you want to know what happened at a specific spot in a city, speak to the cab drivers.

Find the truffle, the key to observe

Seeing is easy while observing is harder. First is passive while the second is active. Instead of looking into a forest and see only trees, it is the pure observation that can lead you to where the truffles grow. Find the truffle!

The silent dog tells just as much as the loud one

The dog who does not bark tells just as much of a story as the one that does. This excerpt was from The Hound of the Baskervilles where Sherlock was the only one noticing that the dogs were not barking when they usually were and based on that observation went to investigate.

Observation is just as much of what is as of what is not but should be.

Observe and listen

Observation is also about listening. To become a better listener, remember the following steps

  • Ask questions
  • Don’t interrupt
  • Focus on the speaker
  • Cut out distractions

Repeat keywords as names or locations out loud to make them stick in the memory.

“As a rule, the more bizarre a thing is the less mysterious it proves to be. It is your commonplace, featureless crimes which are really puzzling, just as a commonplace face is the most difficult to identify.”

― Arthur Conan Doyle, The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes

Do lucky persons get more luck?

Lucky persons generate their own luck by noticing chance, listening to intuition and create positive expectations. Failure sucks, but instructs!

“The harder I work, the luckier I get!”

― Samuel Goldwyn

The process of logical deduction

  1. Accumulate evidence. Collect it all and analyze what you have often.
  2. Ask questions to fund answers.
  3. Create hypothesizes and analyze
  4. Evaluate your hypothesis to see if they hold up to scrutiny
  5. Conclusions based on all the above and back to first.

The devil is in the detail. Often the tiniest details give away the biggest truths

Facts and theories

Fit theories to facts, never fit facts to your theories. In the first, you are reading the evidence, in the latter, you are rewriting evidence to fit your theory.

The Google effect

Even Socrates identified that memory changed with the written word. This is not a Google effect.

Body language

Body language is the biggest part of communication. Part of the dialogue.

Focus on the big picture

Always keep your eye on the big picture, even though you only have a small piece of information. Find your own optimal place and process to analyze information in the best possible way. Don’t put over-trust in intuition!

Note taking

Power of note taking is to stop taking verbatim notes. Cut out the discussions and instead note down thoughts. Draw and color code. Categorise! Use memory relocation and bind important data to personal anchors. Use churning or mnemonics to build a story.

When all the impossible have been excluded, what remains, however improbable, must be the truth.

― Arthur Conan Doyle

Don’t mistake correlation for causation

Key learnings/Takeaways

My biggest take away from this book must be the power of deducing based on a better observational skill. It made me so interested in the subject that I have started to read the actual Sherlock Holmes books to pick up his way of seeing the world. To become more observant in everyday situations is something that really does seem like a superpower.

How to think as Sherlock Holmes book cover
How to think as Sherlock Holmes book cover